DNS Issues

COM vs. NET domains

There seems to be some confusion about the use of the top-level domains COM and NET. COM is mandated for commercial entities, while NET is mandated for the NIC and NOC, administrative, and node computers of network providers. Many, many end-user Internet service providers are incorrectly giving their domestic general-use servers domains in NET, and giving their customers ".net" email addresses.

Update: Somebody recently reported on comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains that InterNIC responded to their request for a NET domain asking if they were sure they met the proper criteria. Could InterNIC be forming a solid policy on the use of NET domains? (2/13/96)

InterNIC begins charging

On September 13, 1995, Network Solutions, Inc., the registration services division of InterNIC, began charging for domains within the COM, ORG, NET, EDU, and GOV top-level domains. The fee is $50 per year, with the first two years prepaid for new registrations. This caused an uproar in the Internet community, mainly because NSI did not give much notice before implementing the new policy, and it appeared to many that NSI was trying to place itself in a monopoly position where there would be no competition.

It's probably just as well, though, because these domains, especially COM, have grown tremendously in recent years, and the ability of the DNS to handle such immensely huge top-level zones much longer is questionable. As of this writing, the COM zone file is 21MB. DNS was meant to be a very hierarchical system, and the continued use of these flat domain spaces does not take advantage of hierarchy. With the charging of the traditional domain names, perhaps people will turn to the more efficient geographical name space.

Personal domain hierarchy?

Every once in a while, the issue of a personal domain hierarchy has been raised on the comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains newsgroup. Such a hierarchy would involve a new top-level domain, such as "PERS", and provide a mechanism for potentially every human being on the planet to register a domain within this hierarchy independent of geography. Nobody has yet to provide an elegant way of organizing such a hierarchy, however. Personal names could not be used, because so many people share the same name. Many people contend that such a hierarchy would be so necessarily abstract that it would be useless.


Last modified: April 10, 2003 02:58:41 UTC
David Simmons
send mail